Celeb or Not, LA Keeps Mug Shots Private

October 17th, 2007

If you are a celebrity with a nose for trouble, here’s some advice: Stay within city limits or risk having your mug shot broadcast around the world.Unlike Malibu, Santa Monica or Glendale, where law enforcement agencies release booking photos, the city of Los Angeles refuses to fork them over unless investigators decide a picture will help with a criminal investigation or they feel the public is in danger.

The latest celebrity to escape mug shot fallout was Britney Spears, who reported to a Los Angeles police station in suburban Van Nuys on Monday and was booked on charges of hit-and-run and driving without a valid license.

Stars accused of breaking the law in Los Angeles and some surrounding cities — including celebrity-rich Burbank and Beverly Hills — can consider themselves fortunate. Just ask Mel Gibson, Nick Nolte or Lindsay Lohan, who were caught in less-friendly precincts.

“There are certain photos that will follow them forever,” said veteran Hollywood publicist Stan Rosenfield. “The mug shot alone doesn’t get you the notoriety. It’s the bad mug shot that stays with you.”

Booking mugs have long been a standard for law enforcement agencies, and they become part of a person’s criminal record. The Pinkerton National Detective Agency said it created the mug shot concept back in the 1850s when the pictures were attached to wanted posters.

As recently as a decade ago, suspects would be snapped holding a tablet with the date of their arrest and an assigned booking number. Many law enforcement agencies have scrapped that format thanks to digital cameras that can be linked to computer databases.

There is no question that celebrity mug shots are some of the most identifiable and most-used photos today because of an insatiable appetite for entertainment news.

There are the embarrassing — Hugh Grant getting arrested for lewd conduct with a prostitute in 1995.

There are the somewhat glamorous — a well-groomed, slightly smiling Paris Hilton after she went to jail earlier this year for violating her probation in an alcohol-related reckless driving case.

And then there is the downright bizarre — a disheveled Nolte in a Hawaiian shirt, hair askew, after he was stopped for driving erratically on Pacific Coast Highway in 2002.

The most infamous booking mug might be O.J. Simpson’s 1994 photo after he was arrested for investigation of murdering his former wife and her friend. He was later acquitted.

Grant’s photo was the last known celebrity mug shot released by Los Angeles police, Lt. Roger Mora said. One of Hilton’s booking shots taken by the LAPD was accidentally released by the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Mora said the LAPD wouldn’t rule out the release of a mug shot, but it would be at the department’s discretion based on a “particular crime.”

“Generally speaking, we don’t release mug shots,” Mora said. “We treat everyone equally.”

Sheriff’s officials release mug shots on a “case-by-case basis,” spokesman Steve Whitmore said. He cited a 2003 opinion by then-California Attorney General Bill Lockyer that said mug shots are part of the investigative record that can be made available to the public.

“If there is a request for a booking photo, we check to make sure it wouldn’t hurt an investigation,” Whitmore said. “If it doesn’t, we get approval and then release it.

“We don’t treat celebrity photos any different. We look at inmates with an equality, regardless of their standing.”

But do booking photos — both of celebrities and garden variety criminals — serve a higher purpose?

Rosenfield believes the release of the pictures “sensationalizes an arrest in most cases.”

“I think it would be great,” he said, “if booking photos weren’t released, across the board.”

Robbie Williams ‘close to relapse’

October 16th, 2007

Robbie Williams

Robbie Williams is close to a drink and drugs relapse just eight months after leaving rehab, according to a former lover.

He sought help for his addictions at a strict rehabilitation clinic in Tucson, Arizona earlier this year.

But despite intensive therapy for an addiction to painkillers, Williams remains plagued by his demons, according to ex-girlfriend Suzanne Coplin.

She tells British newspaper the News of the World: “His addictions are far from behind him. It is a struggle for him to stay out of trouble every second of his life.

“He is just so vulnerable and said to me: ‘When will I be free from this hell?”

Pharrell Williams grilled on working with Spears

October 16th, 2007

Rapper Pharrell Williams was to forced to apologise to a reporter after he reacted to a tough question about working with Britney Spears.
Britney
Williams got edgy when Karen Koster asked him if he would ever work with Spears again, reports dailysnack.com. After taking offence at the question, Williams was taken away by his PR people. But later he apologised to Koster and even answered two more questions.

Williams had co-produced Spears’ hit “I’m A Slave 4 U” in 2001.

Koster said: “He was pretty annoyed when I asked the Britney question but then he softened a bit. Later, I thought we were all done, but he comes over, places his hand on my back and says that he still felt bad.”

Fashion for all

October 9th, 2007

Fashion for allParis fashion week: eight days, 90 shows, a cast of thousands, a budget of millions. And how many trends? Er, none, actually. Nada, zero, zilch. At a push, you could count florals as a trend, but predicting that people may wear floral prints in summer is a bit like forecasting that they will wear sunglasses or eat ice cream. When something happens every summer, it’s not a trend.Trends have become the comfort food of style, the clothes on which we mindlessly retail-snack. They govern how we dress, whether we like it or not. With catwalk interpretations in every store, and the high street bringing us a new look every three to six weeks (that’s our attention span for a new look these days, apparently) what we buy is almost inevitably trend-led. So the mood in Paris last week was uncertain and a little bewildered. Six months ago, designers marched us smartly into gothic black, body-con and power dressing. Now they are beating a semi-retreat back into romance and prettiness, and we are left wrong-footed. To add to the unease, while there is no one mood, no single direction to be gleaned from Paris this season, this does not mean that all outfits are to be deemed equal. Far from it. There will still be a fashion in-crowd – it’s just that this season, you can’t hope to join the club simply by buying the key piece, the puffball skirt or mustard-coloured jumper. The look of the moment is as exclusive as ever: it’s just going to be harder than ever to pin down.

We can start with butterfly wings. Fashion is, after all, the zeitgeist with a price tag, and micro-trends are as much a phenomenon of fashion retail as of electioneering. In his book Microtrends, Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s chief adviser, has identified trends that while small – linking, say, 1% of the population – can become extremely powerful in our internet era, in which like-minded people can find each other and join forces. Similarly, our sophisticated, fast-moving fashion industry can now lend momentum to seemingly insignificant trends; the choice is such that there is, arguably, no longer any need for the whole of womankind to sign up to boho. Certain motifs and ideas recurred in Paris, albeit without an overarching trend to link them.At Alexander McQueen, butterfly-wing prints appeared on a long, fluttery silk dress; at Miu Miu, they quivered in 3D on the front of a pair of sandals. Frock coats made a sequence of cameo appearances: in cream silk at Christian Dior, cinched tight in Prince of Wales check at Alexander McQueen, zipped at Givenchy, deconstructed at Hussein Chalayan. The subverted-French-maid look cropped up twice (super-short, like aprons without a skirt, at Miu Miu; in lime and white frills at Giambattista Valli).

The fact that the two noblest fashion houses of Paris – Chanel and Yves Saint Laurent – both chose stars as their motif of the season could be seen as a micro-trend; the appearance of turbans at Sonia Rykiel and at Hermès likewise, especially since turban-style wrapping was the inspiration and recurring theme of Francesca Versace’s first collection, Francesca V. Nor is the micro-trends phenomenon limited to Paris: in Milan, a fad for casual floorlength gowns – a wardrobe category that didn’t exist this time last year – made star turns at labels as diverse as Armani and Roberto Cavalli.

If butterfly wings, frock coats and French maids are micro-trends, there are some mini-trends around too. First up is simplicity, albeit unfortunately not simplicity of the jeans-and-white-T-shirt kind: this is statement (read, expensive) simplicity. For the first time in years, outfits made up of separates in the same print hit the runway: at Louis Vuitton and at Miu Miu, but most strikingly at Balenciaga, which about turned from last season’s Global Traveller (clashy-clashy, we’re calling it) to a collection in which every outfit was made up of a single print of a vibrant hydrangea or poppy. At Celine, the new mood of reborn, super-luxe matchy-matchy shone through in the hot pink cocktail dress, worn with perfectly matched bag and shoes. A complete no-no a month ago, this look has suddenly found favour. Victoria Beckham, who appears to have some sort of obsession with matching accessories to her dress, will be in heaven.

Nicholas Ghesquière said of his new collection that, wherever possible, each outfit was comprised of just one piece. The new statement simplicity means top billing for dresses – with playsuits and jumpsuits also making a strong showing as one-piece outfits. The headline dress shape of the season is strapless, with a bustier giving added shape at the neckline and the hips slightly exaggerated: this dress, in myriad guises, cropped up everywhere from Lanvin and Yves Saint Laurent to Agnès b.

Perhaps the most noticeable trend of the week was not, strictly, a clothing one at all. For the past five years, “It” handbags have been a fashion, retail and media phenomenon – at times, the cover star of Grazia has seemed to be as much the oversized, £1,000 masterpiece of YSL buffalo hide as the undersized actor carrying it. But suddenly, shoes rather than bags are where it’s at for the first time since, well, Sex and the City was on the small rather than the big screen. Just as many shows in past seasons have seemed to be little more than vehicles for the handbag cash cows, this season it was the shoes that seemed to jump off the catwalk.

At Miu Miu, for instance, the ultra-naivety of the clothes was belied by the fabulous, sophisticated shoes: T-bars, with gold teacup handles on the heels, and round-toed court shoes, with heels so high the wearer seemed almost en pointe, tied with ballerina ribbon criss-crossed at the ankle.

So how does all this translate into getting dressed? We fashion hounds have been gnawing away at this issue on your behalf all week, and what we have come up with is this: it’s floaty, but with a bit of a jacket, and a shoe with a good chunk of a heel. (Two shoes, obviously, with a chunk of a heel each, but after a month of catwalking, we’ve lapsed into the fashion singular: “a boot” rather than boots and “a jean” rather than jeans. One of our number, who shall remain anonymous, announced on Saturday that she was looking forward to a drink and “a nice olive”.)

The handbag-versus-shoe struggle is important here: while handbags and shoes are, arguably, both about sex and power, they represent different aspects of each. A handbag is more ladylike, a shoe more strident. And while a stiletto heel is a half-hidden menace, a stolid heel – this season’s choice – is an open threat. (Fuck-you shoes, rather than fuck-me shoes, if you will.)

Colour matters too. The French editors on whom I have had the most resounding style crush this season are both doing floaty-with-a-bit-of-a-jacket-and-a-chunk-of-a-heel for winter, but in black; come spring, they and everyone else will be doing it in colour.Fashion for all

There are two colour camps next season. Some labels, such as Lanvin or Louis Vuitton, are going with marzipan brights while others, such as Antonio Berardi and Vanessa Bruno, are plumping for blush: the colour of pale skin crossed with a pink party dress.

As to where to get your floaty with a bit of a jacket and a chunk of a heel look – I did warn you this season wasn’t the snappiest – I have to start with Vanessa Bruno, if only because the 40-year-old designer herself took her bow in possibly the best example of the look I saw all week: a blush-pink tuxedo-style jacket, worn open with a simple white cotton skirt and vest. The clothes in the show – especially the lace-over-lime shorts and lace-over-peach jacket – were beautiful too. Stella McCartney captured the look with soft blazers over elegant silk shorts; Antonio Berardi with jackets and trousers in silk the colour of full-cream milk. Some designers I shall refrain from mentioning decided to channel the “floaty” part of the look into those hideous low-crotch pants. Christian Dior captured the sharp/soft contrast with trompe l’oeil dresses made to resemble a waistcoat and long skirt; Loewe had jackets and shorts in sand-coloured suede. Nina Ricci, designed by Olivier Theyskens, put a darker spin on the floaty-plus-jacket look, so that the models looked like gothic wood nymphos. There are brands in Paris that march to the beat of their own drum. At Louis Vuitton, Marc Jacobs continued to experiment with imbuing new value to a fashion brand by means of artistic input, collaborating with artist Richard Prince on a range of handbags and shoes which deliberately challenged notions of quality. The LV logo, for instance, was stamped smudgily, as it might be in a bad fake. (Readers who follow catwalk sagas might be interested to hear that Jacobs’ backstage demeanour did nothing to suggest his tantrum with the fashion world over the bad reception to his New York show is over. After the show, he greeted Prince loudly thus: “Did you like it? Because there’s only one person who I cared if they liked the show, and that’s you. If you liked what we did with your stuff, then I don’t give a fuck what the rest of the world thinks.” Loud and clear, Mark, loud and clear.

Chanel next season was an ode to Americana: a prom queen with a camellia corsage. Alexander McQueen was a homage to Isabella Blow, with a high neck, a square shoulder, a tiny waist and a vertiginous heel for day; a romantic gown with a corset and some bosom for night. Lacroix was bright and shiny and beribboned, like fashion giftwrap. Hermès was jodhpurs, cocktail dresses with built-in pashminas, riding boots in hot pink crocodile; everything for the foxy maharajah. Chloé was, well, I didn’t get Chloé at all. Dingy layers for women who want to look soft but not pretty, kooky but not interesting, is the best I can come up with. This, in all, was a season which asked more questions than it resolved. But chin up – you can always wear florals.

Jonathan Ross attacks Robbie Williams, Chris Langham, Amy Winehouse! The List Goes On!

October 9th, 2007

Jonatha RossShowbiz Spy can exclusively reveal that Jonathan Ross launched scathing attacks on a whole list of celebrities at the Q Awards last night, most notably Robbie Williams, Chris Langham and Amy Winehouse, who have all gone through troubled times in the last year.

The talk show host and Radio 2 DJ had a field day, seeing that Amy Winehouse failed to turn up at the event, commenting whilst reading her name out to receive her Best Album of the Year gong: “I was on a 3-1 bet that Amy would die before Pavarotti. I’m really annoyed with Amy that I lost.

Ross decided that he would continue by slating Robbie Williams for his invisible career in America: “The Q Hero award should really be deserved by superheroes. Robbie Williams should get a superhero award – for being invisible in America.”

The chat show host also attacked jailed actor Chris Langham, by joking about his past success at the British Comedy Awards.

Ross said: “They gave an award to Langham – a nine-year-old boy. Normally, they give a trophy.”

The TV star jibed veteran rockers Led Zeppelin about their recent reunion, telling the audience: “There were millions of hits on the website to register for tickets to their gig. It was probably all the pensioners suffering from Parkinson’s clicking the mouse more than they should.”

Paris Fashion Week: Round up review

October 8th, 2007

Paris fashion weekWhile Milan had romance, Paris said it with flowers. The floral dance began at Balenciaga, where Nicolas Ghesquière delivered an electrifying collection in peony, rose, gladioli, violet and gardenia prints from the archives, digitally enhanced for supranormal shape and colour possible only in computer-land.

In sumptuous fabrics, such as silk faille and radzimir, his sculpted short dresses and micro-suits over shorts appeared as dazzling as sunlight on stained glass.

Shoulders were curved, skirts belled, corset-lacing replaced seams and the thong concept continued with metal-heeled gladiator sandals.

The theme was taken to the opposite extreme at John Galliano. Here all was softness, frills, retro bias-cuts and gentle pastels, with the emphasis on roses; printed on chiffon, appliquéd in silk and half-hidden within the folds of a ruffled peplum.

Elsewhere, florals were tropical. Antonio Marras at Kenzo hacked his way through a rainforest to produce exotic blooms, knitted in jacquard, beaded in sequins or splashed on silk.

Dries Van Noten focused on the jungles of Bali and Borneo, with mis-matched orchid, hibiscus and frangipani-print cotton and silk, wrapped and draped in sari- and sarong-folds, and variations on sarouel trousers.

Mini-florals came in wafting chiffon at Stella McCartney, or bunched into voluminous cotton blousons at Junya Watanabe. Christian Lacroix splashed Impressionist roses on demoiselle dresses. Limi Feu, daughter of Yohji Yamamoto, showed silver roses on black full skirts.

Alexander McQueen, eschewed the flower-strewn path, but poured his heart and soul into a collection of outrageous beauty in a tribute to his late friend, muse and mentor, the fashion icon, Isabella Blow.

Hourglass tailoring of exquisite precision; “geisha” silks; “samurai” leathers; feather-print chiffon; gowns hand-stitched with feathers and worn with silk butterfly hats and crystal dragonfly pillboxes by Philip Treacy – all a vivid reminder of Blow’s eccentric, stylish wardrobe.Paris fashion week

Prints were important, even when not floral: stars and stripes at Chanel; leopard-spot and pinstripe at Dior; Minoan friezes at Sophia Kokosalaki; and rock-and-roll T-shirts with computerised “Old Master” mixes in Olivier Theyskens’s collection for Nina Ricci, accessorised with marabou and ostrich feathers.

Yohji Yamamoto explored the George Sand-Frédéric Chopin wardrobe in dramatic black-and-silver tailcoat-and-crinoline marriages, with “tattoo” prints.

Crinolines also starred in Rei Kawakubo’s cacophony of colour, print and global references at Comme des Garçons, while Jean Paul Gaultier inveigled feather and satin crinolines into his Pirates of the Caribbean in camouflage.

Christina Aguilera Registers For Baby Shower Gifts

October 8th, 2007

Christina Aguilera

Christina Aguilera Registers For Baby Shower Gifts

She may not have confirmed her pregnancy publicly, but that didn’t stop pop singer Christina Aguilera from selecting a baby registry in West Hollywood on Saturday night.Aguilera and her husband, record executive Jordan Bratman visited Bel Bambini, a trendy baby boutique on the celeb-friendly Robertson Boulevard according to People.

Aguilera and Bratman were accompanied by Bratman’s mom and sister as they perused theshop’s shelves, picking out a host of items for the singer’s upcoming baby shower.

“They registered for all the accessories,” store sales employee Crysta Smith told People. “They were both picking out things together.”Among the items the couple reportedly selected? Blankets, bottles, clothes and diaper bags.
“She looked beautiful,” Smith told People of Aguilera. “She had a little bump. She said she was so excited.”

Britney Spears: Who’s profiting from her breakdown?

October 8th, 2007

Britney Spears
After years of being fodder for the celebrity press, Britney Spears’s train wreck of a story hit a news high last week when a judge with less tolerance for her antics than the public took away custody, at least temporarily, of her two young sons.

The stern ruling lent her saga a dose of poignancy. For all her recent bizarre, unexplainable behavior, Spears is now a mother in danger of losing permanent custody of her two toddlers, ages 2 and 1.

But the latest installment also showed that the attention paid to this long-running public drama has become a force of its own – one that sells magazines and music, increases Web traffic and gives obscure characters their minutes of fame.

Who won and who lost in the latest twists of the Britney story?

When it comes to traffic, “Britney is Old Faithful,” said Harvey Levin, the managing editor of TMZ.com, one of the top gossip Web sites, adding that both page views and unique visitors spike when an item on her appears, though he declined to give exact figures. Since the ruling last week, which was followed by an order that allows Spears monitored visits every other day, the site has run numerous updates.

Levin said interest in Spears outweighed that of any other celebrity among TMZ’s users. “There are people who love her and there are people who think she’s a train wreck,” he said, “and everybody wonders how it’s going to end.”

Staying in the public eye, even scandalously, has generated a high amount of interest in Spears’s artistic comeback. Despite her lethargic performance at the MTV Video Music Awards last month, derided by critics and viewers, her single “Gimme More” is selling strongly. It has been the No. 1 singles download on iTunes and sold more than 179,000 copies in its first week on sale on digital services. Largely as a result of those sales, the song pole-vaulted from No. 68 to No. 3 in the week ending Sunday, Sept. 30, on Billboard’s Hot 100 chart, which tracks sales, radio airplay and other types of demand.

Spears’s record company is readying the release of a video and an album.

Is controversy good for sales? Geoff Mayfield, Billboard’s director of charts, said the strong sales of “Gimme More” reflected pent-up demand since the single only recently became available after weeks of radio play. He and others in the music industry said it remained to be seen how all the attention Spears is getting will affect sales of the album, which, they noted, must appeal musically if it is to sell well.

But one way her personal troubles are undermining a comeback is the time they take away from her ability to promote her music. “Without a doubt, her personal life has prevented her from keeping the focus on the video, the song and everything that should accompany the release of a worldwide superstar’s record,” said Jeff Rabhan, a talent manager who represents the singer Michelle Branch and other artists.

Michael Pagnotta, a music manager and publicist who most recently represented the Olsen twins, said Spears risks irreversible damage to her career. “There’s a tipping point and she’s close to it,” he said. “Michael Jackson found this out.”

Right after Spears’s MTV appearance, Chris Crocker, a fan, made a two-minute video for YouTube in which he rails against Spears’s detractors while sobbing. The “Leave Britney Alone!” video has become one of the site’s most viewed entries of all time, with more than 10.8 million viewers, and Crocker is making appearances on American talk shows.

A former bodyguard, Tony Barretto, who worked for Spears from March to May, hired the media-savvy lawyer Gloria Allred to inject himself into the custody case (and onto television news shows), by reporting that he had seen Spears snorting cocaine at a nightclub and driving unsafely with the kids, among other transgressions. Last Wednesday, Barretto met with officials from the Department of Children and Family Services for about two hours and asked for an investigation of Spears’s behavior.

Allred said her client, the father of two young children, was motivated by concern over the well-being of Spears’s children, not personal gain.

It appears that the 24/7 coverage of Spears worked to her disadvantage in recent days. TMZ says lawyers for Kevin Federline, her former husband, subpoenaed one of its videos showing the pop star driving with her children late last month without a valid license, in direct violation of an order by the judge presiding over the custody case.

Janice Min, editor in chief of US Weekly, said, “I’m not sure that the change in custody would have occurred so quickly had the press not actually been so closely following her role as a mother.”

Levin of TMZ said Spears needed “a wake-up call.”

“It’s not a frivolous story anymore,” he said. “This is a woman who loves her kids who doesn’t have her kids. It’s now taken tragic elements.”

CroModa.com – New fashion portal

October 8th, 2007

CroModa.com

We present you new fashion website. CroModa.com is a leading croatian fashion portal.

Visit it here: CroModa.com

Victoria Beckham shows her Ugly side

October 5th, 2007

Victoria Beckham shows her Ugly side

Her obsession with couture, twiggy frame and primped appearance meant Victoria Beckham fitted right into Ugly Betty’s world of high fashion.

The Spice Girl recently filmed a starring role on the award-winning Channel 4 programme, Ugly Betty – and walked a way with a rather hefty pay check.

She was reportedly paid an impressive £70,000 for a one-off cameo appearance in an episode titled Nice Day for a Posh Wedding.

This sneak peek picture shows Victoria playing bridesmaid to Ugly Betty villain Wilhelmina (Vanessa Williams), who is set to wed Alan Dale’s Bradford Meade.

Of course, Posh’s starring role wasn’t complete without a head to toe designer outfit – she looked right at home in a figure hugging Vera Wang dress.

Victoria was first suggested for a cameo role after meeting actor Eric Mabius, who plays Daniel Meade, at an awards ceremony in London.

He was convinced she would be perfect for a walk-on role.

Producer Marco Pennette joked that he wanted David Beckham to come along to filming.

Before shooting started, he said: “We want her husband on set. It’s one of the requirements.”

A source told The Sun Posh fitted right in: “Victoria had a blast filming – and everyone loved having her on.”

He added: “Obviously she’s a fashion expert herself, so she fitted right in at Mode.”

Ugly Betty, which also stars Extras actress Ashley Jensen, is one of the most popular shows on US TV.